The Hypothesis of Evolution by Joe La Bianca

I went to a blog site and looked up the word science. I noticed that evolution was everywhere. Evolution is not even called a science, it is admitted to be only a theory. But that’s not even true. In truth, evolution is only a hypothesis. A hypothesis is just an assumption. Someone makes an assumption, and then goes out to either prove or disprove the assumption. Science, which is a word that means observable evidence, has disproved the assumption of evolution.
Just look at the direction that nature is going. The stars die out. We’ve never seen one star turning on or being born. Why? Because they don’t come into being, they just die out. This is the opposite of the assumption of evolution.
Our planet is slowing down in it’s rotation. After time it will stop and, if left to itself, will die. Why? Because God, the Prime Mover, started the rotation of the Earth, and the laws of science are taking their downward course. We will talk about the two laws of science in a moment.
Look at the progress of the human race. Over time, instead of getting better, the race is getting worse. Mutations happen as man goes through time, and these mutations always hurt us. We are not observably getting more evolved. We are heading in the same direction as the stars and everything else. We are going down. Strangely, the Evolutionists use mutations as their mechanism for how the theory is supposed to work. But mutations are always a loss of genetic information. Mutations never add DNA.
Evolution is an anti-science. Those who believe in this propaganda do so in the face of the real science that disproves it. It’s a religion, not a science. The followers are Atheists and their god is delusion.
Reader, please understand that mankind is not connected to any other species of animal in either the fossil record or the living record. I know you are thinking of the ape men, but they have all been found to be false, fake or just apes.
Neither do we find animals emerging from the one common ancestor. They are separated after their kinds, just like the bible says. If evolution were true, we should find in-between stages, but we do not. What is more, there should be more in-between kinds than finished kinds if it were true. This is because it would take many more gradual stages of pre-animals to produce the finished animal. But all we find are finished things, things that are fully functional. Why? Because God created every creature after its own kind, finished and fully functional. Science supports the idea of Creation, not Evolution. Remember that science is only what we can see, not what we assume.
I’ve been speaking of macro science, science that deals with the large. Evolution has no macro-science and they know this, so they moved on to micro-science without any foundation. They try to run away from this truth and major on the minors. Hence all the weird things you hear today, things that are taken for granted and beyond logic. They are making evolutionary assumptions in micro-science when all the while the macro-science disproves evolution. It’s like a computer with no hardware. How can you run the software without the hardware? Indeed, they do not even have the software. There are two laws that govern all of science, both the macro (or big science), and the micro (or small science).
Now the two laws. You must remember that these are laws, not theories or hypotheses. A law is time tested, predictable in a lab and proven beyond a doubt. These laws are called the laws of thermodynamics. The first law of thermodynamics, or heat energy, is the law of conservation. The second is the law of entropy. These two fundamental laws prove that evolution is false. The laws are operating in the wrong direction as evolution. Evolution has the universe growing in order and complexity, but the two laws show that the universe had a definite beginning and is now growing more disorderly by the moment.
The law of conservation says that there is no new matter coming into or going out of existence, that everything is being conserved. Matter doesn’t pop into the universe and it doesn’t pop out. It changes form, from solid to gas. The exchange makes energy. This law fits perfectly with the bible where it says that God rested from, or finished creation. Creation is done and we have a law of science to prove it.
There is no law that explains how evolution could happen. In order for matter to pop in, there must be Someone who popped it in. The fact that we are here cannot be explained by the evolution model. But a Supreme Being could have created us, or popped us in.
Evolutionists try to explain the existence of matter without God. They come up with non-scientific, foolish ideas. They say that the universe was the size of a grapefruit. Then a sudden cold whoosh happened to grow the universe to its present materiel size. I’m not kidding. There is no science behind these beliefs, just beliefs. But they believe them because they cannot accept God. This is what they are teaching as fact in schools. Now what is easier to believe? An unexplained whoosh created the universe without any evidence or mechanism, or an Almighty God did? By the way, they start with a grapefruit - which is cheating. You must start with nothing to have an origin. But without God, mankind cannot conceive of an origin. Go ahead, try. You can’t do it. So I say that atheism is inconceivable.
The second is the law of entropy. This says that everything is winding down, like a clock that is slowing, rusting, and dying. This whole universe is going from good to bad, from order to disorder. This is the opposite of what evolution teaches. Evolution has the world going from less order and complexity to more, in opposition to a fundamental law of science. And evolutionists have the gall to say that their disproved assumption of evolution is unimpeachable, undeniable scientific fact.
Where did this drastic devolution through entropy begin? Where did the second law start? Well, the bible has a teaching that perfectly describes the law of entropy and its origin. When Adam and Eve….what? You don’t believe in Adam and Eve? OK, let me get this out of the way first, then I’ll go on.
Everyone in the world, whether Evolutionist or Christian or whatever, believes in a fully functional first man and a fully functional first woman. In order for the first two people to have children they had to be operational: in good working order, or working at the moment.
An ape man couldn’t wait for his woman ape to evolve, they had to both evolve together. Pretty lucky, huh? I wonder what the odds are for two people, male and female, to evolve without any known process, in the same generation and location. And you say that Genesis is hard to believe. We are growing as a population. If we went into reverse we would decrease until we got to two. There’s your original couple.
So as I was saying, Adam and Eve sinned, so God cursed the creation. This is evidenced in the second law of thermodynamics. The first and second laws clearly show that evolution did not happen. They also show that the universe had a beginning. If the universe had a beginning, then Hinduism and Buddhism are also wrong, for they say that the universe had no beginning - that it goes on forever. We can tell from science that the universe had a beginning and that, if left to itself, it has an ending.
God didn’t stop at the curse. He promised to send a Savior that would be wounded by Satan, by the cross, but would eventually crush the head of that old snake through the resurrection. If a person believes that Jesus died for their sins, they are saved and put back into God’s family. For them it’s like the fall of man never happened, and they are with God, walking in the cool of the day.
So we see that true science, which is observable evidence, supports the Gospel story and goes against the assumption of Evolution. Choose this day whom you will serve, the Lord who made us and saved us, or Charles Darwin, dead in the ground, under some church in England.