There are many such verses which seem at first blush to support anihilism, or even the cold narrow determinism and eternal torture espoused by Calvin - if taken literally.Part of the problem, has to do with translation and mis-interpretation, part has to do with pre-conceived notions, which entered the collective Christian mindset due to the influence of a few key individuals.The Calvinistic model (influenced by Augustine), portrays God as evil in that he predestined (knowingly and willingly), to cast the vast majority of humanity (the Non-Elect) to be tortured in hell forever.The Arminian model portrays God as both weak and evil, in that he is incapable of triumphing over Satan and sinful man's freewill to do evil, and bring them to salvation - thus he is forced to torture them forever.Some within both camps opt for an anihilistic view, rather than eternal torture, which still leaves God's plan of salvation frustrated for the vast majority. Most men doomed to live out their miserable existence of sin and suffering, only to be destroyed - not exactly "Good News".A third view sees God's plan of salvation successful, but progressing through ages. The elect are saved in this age, the rest in another. Words translated as forever meaning "to the end of the age", and fire being purifying and beneficial, rather than vindictive punishment, or eternal destruction.The three camps exist because there are verses to support each, and verses that are hard to reconcile to each. At least in the third view, God is both loving and all powerful. His will to save all mankind is not thwarted, and he ultimately reconciles all of creation to himself (Col. 1:20)This article
HERE expands a little on this line of thought.However, this is a topic that requires an in depth study to flesh out all the arguments made by the 3 opposing views. There is a more lengthy and scholarly work
HERE
--
Ken Rich
https://kenrich.me